Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Christian and Theologically Protestant? Or, sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Fenced Community

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible- believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non- Nicene, non- Biblical heresy.
Register now

Christforums

.... an orthodox (true and correct when contrasted with Liberal theology) Protestant forum whose members espouse the Apostolic doctrines in the Biblical theologies set forth by Augustine, Martin Luther, Ulrich Zwingli, John Calvin and John Knox etc. We do not "argue" with nor do we solicit the membership of people who espouse secular or cultic ideologies. We believe that our conversations are to be faith building and posts that advance heretical or apostate thinking will be immediately deleted and the poster permanently banned from the forum. This is a Christian Protestant community for people to explore the traditional theologies of Classical Protestantism.

Christian Fellowship

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
Sign in to follow this  
Garrison

Transhumanism Is The Entire History of Mankind.

Recommended Posts

In fact, today we have no idea what was the original genotype and phenotype of God's original design of Man. Increasingly these days during Archeological work, atypical hominids are being dug up, many having enough DNA residue to be sequenced, whereby heretofore unknown profiles are astonishingly identified.

 

Transhumanism in the Garden of Eden occurred via Eve's submission to Satan, where she crossed the barrier into knowledge, and she with Adam were then changed. Fallen angels mated with human females and produced Nephalim Giants. The Philistines perpetuated the Nephalim lineage. Each Race on Earth had its own Creator, YHWH being that of the Semites. The "humanism" we claim to experience in ourselves today is but a fraction of the capacity of our brains. During creation, God repeatedly stated the parameter of all creatures to be "After Its Kind," indicating those barriers are at risk to be violated. And it repeatedly has occurred, even within the Human Genome.

 

The naivety of Christians today upon this is astounding. There are no genetically pure humans living today.

Edited by Garrison

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Each Race on Earth had its own Creator, YHWH being that of the Semites.

If each race had a different creator, how to you explain Genesis 3:20, "The man called his wife's name Eve, because she was the mother of all living?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All living what? Tell me about your assumptions.

 

I don't assume anything. The Bible tells us that Eve was the mother of the whole human race.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I don't assume anything. The Bible tells us that Eve was the mother of the whole human race.

 

The Text does not specify "whole human race." If it does, cite the words rather than assume.

 

if Cain feared for his life at the hands of other existing people, having knowledge that other nonsiblings existed on Earth, where did these people come from?

 

Please Glorify our Savior with sentient assessments in order to magnify the Name of God.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if Cain feared for his life at the hands of other existing people, having knowledge that other nonsiblings existed on Earth, where did these people come from?

Genesis 5:4 says, "The days of Adam after he fathered Seth were 800 years; and he had other sons and daughters." These other sons and daughters were the ones he feared. And why didn't you ask where Cain got his wife? The answer to that is that he married one of his sisters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's go ahead and briefly review the 800 year time line so skillfully mentioned.

 

Cain made his safety plea to God before the birth of Seth and before the 800 years. Therefore, the siblings and family of Adam had not yet come into being. Not quite yet, even for purposes of a thin discussion point. Cain spoke of people extant at the time of his fear for his life before the 800 years. From where did these existing people originate? Not from Adam, and to admit this point will send nobody to Hell. God is Truth, popularized human notions and short sight are not Truth.

 

Let us again praise God for the excellence of His Word, available to those unappointed hearts who deign confusion of sequential logic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The sons of God are the offspring of Seth who mated with the dauaghters of men the offspring of Cain. There's no telling how many offspring Adam had before Cain and Able or in-between their births.

Cain was marked, prehaps his mark was the cause of the giant gene or the opposite, Cain's offspring were smaller.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, there is telling how many offspring Adam had before Cain and Able. Zero. There Is no geneology to claim otherwise.

 

Thirty four of the 35 times "imagine/imagination" is written in Testus Receptus translated as such from 12 original Text words scecifically call human "imagine/imagination" as being "evil" and "from the Devil." Should you be using your imagination to exegete Scripture?

 

No Scripture states the sons of Seth are "The Sons of God."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, there is telling how many offspring Adam had before Cain and Able. Zero. There Is no geneology to claim otherwise.
And you have zero evidence for that claim. You need a course in logic. The fact there is no genealogies proves nothing. Your claim assumes the author would have mentioned them but there is zero evidence to believe that. You cannot deuce that something does not exist simply because someone does not mention it. Moreover, there would have been no need. The author of Genesis is concerned about the Messianic line not the genealogies of those who were not part of that line. Also, if anyone followed your view, then we would have to believe there were no women because no women are mentioned in the genealogies.

 

Thirty four of the 35 times "imagine/imagination" is written in Testus Receptus translated as such from 12 original Text words scecifically call human "imagine/imagination" as being "evil" and "from the Devil."
What? That sentence make zero sense in English.
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, there is telling how many offspring Adam had before Cain and Able. Zero. There Is no geneology to claim otherwise.

 

Thirty four of the 35 times "imagine/imagination" is written in Testus Receptus translated as such from 12 original Text words scecifically call human "imagine/imagination" as being "evil" and "from the Devil." Should you be using your imagination to exegete Scripture?

 

No Scripture states the sons of Seth are "The Sons of God."

 

It's not necessary that there would be a geneolgy of other children. " from the devil" isn't necessarily a genetic trait either.

There is no Scripture that States men are sinners because of breeding with fallen angels. Death and sin came into the world trough Adam, not genetics.

 

Eph. 2:1-3 As for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins, in which you used to live when you followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the kingdom of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are disobedient.

 

Disobedience is how the devil is inside people, not trough genetics.

 

 

Eph. 6: 10-12 Finally, be strong in the Lord and in His mighty power. Put on the full armor of God so that you can take a stand against the devil's schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.

 

It's the devil's schemes that lead to evil imaginations, not genetics. Jesus called people children of satan because that's who they serve, the lord of their thoughts and environment by default.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And you have zero evidence for that claim. You need a course in logic. The fact there is no genealogies proves nothing. Your claim assumes the author would have mentioned them but there is zero evidence to believe that. You cannot deuce that something does not exist simply because someone does not mention it. Moreover, there would have been no need. The author of Genesis is concerned about the Messianic line not the genealogies of those who were not part of that line. Also, if anyone followed your view, then we would have to believe there were no women because no women are mentioned in the genealogies.

 

What? That sentence make zero sense in English.

 

You say I have no evidence there is no evidence. Are you finding some thin thoughts to share?

 

Please be refreshingly aware there indeed are given by God in Genesis and in other Scriptures many geneologies which are not part of Christ's lineage. Do you need someone to do that homework for you? As well, are you unable to do the word study upon "imagine/imagination" as they occur in translation?

 

Women are not given in The Genesis Geneologies because from that time and throughout Scripture they are of less account than Men, are not pillars within the Kingdom of God, are not functionaries within either the Mosaic Law or the Church, and have authority over nothing.

 

Genesis does say there are women. Please review your thoughts using The Word of God.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It's not necessary that there would be a geneolgy of other children. " from the devil" isn't necessarily a genetic trait either.

There is no Scripture that States men are sinners because of breeding with fallen angels. Death and sin came into the world trough Adam, not genetics.

 

Eph. 2:1-3 As for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins, in which you used to live when you followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the kingdom of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are disobedient.

 

Disobedience is how the devil is inside people, not trough genetics.

 

 

Eph. 6: 10-12 Finally, be strong in the Lord and in His mighty power. Put on the full armor of God so that you can take a stand against the devil's schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.

 

It's the devil's schemes that lead to evil imaginations, not genetics. Jesus called people children of satan because that's who they serve, the lord of their thoughts and environment by default.

 

Paul states death and sin came into the World through "the woman," Adam did not transgress. Study it.

 

Genetically determined sin is not part of this OP. Please start your own discussion. Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You say I have no evidence there is no evidence. Are you finding some thin thoughts to share?
Not really and I knew you could not understand the point so I will spell it out again for you. Watch, it is not difficult.

 

You assumed there would be genealogies for those other sons and daughters. Yet you give no reason why there should have been. Again you cannot deuce that something does not exist simply because someone does not mention it. Moreover, there would have been no need for all the genealogies.

 

I, on the other hard, have given a very good reason why those genealogies are not in the text. They were not important to the author because he was concerned with the Messianic line. That is not difficult to figure out.

 

Please be refreshingly aware there indeed are given by God in Genesis and in other Scriptures many geneologies which are not part of Christ's lineage.
No doubt there are, but those are there for a reason. That is the point. No doubt there are many genealogies the author left out. Why? Because they were not important.

 

Do you need someone to do that homework for you?
You can even write a proper English sentence or even spell the word genealogies correctly. You are not fit to even carry books much less read and understand them.

 

As well, are you unable to do the word study upon "imagine/imagination" as they occur in translation?
It is not my fault you cannot write a coherent sentence. The TR is a Geek text.

 

Women are not given in The Genesis Geneologies because from that time and throughout Scripture they are of less account than Men, are not pillars within the Kingdom of God, are not functionaries within either the Mosaic Law or the Church, and have authority over nothing.
Good job! You missed the point again. You must work hard at being wrong so often. My point was, as if you could understand it now, the fact that something is not mention does mean it does not exist. How hard is that for you to understand?

 

Please review your thoughts using The Word of God.
lol What would you know about the word of God?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Paul states death and sin came into the World through "the woman," Adam did not transgress. Study it.

 

Genetically determined sin is not part of this OP. Please start your own discussion. Thank you.

 

Adam did transgress by eating the fruit God commanded him not to and the earth was cursed because of it. (Gen. 3:17-19)

Where in Romans 5 is Eve mentioned?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Paul states death and sin came into the World through "the woman," Adam did not transgress. Study it.
Study more yourself. "Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned." I wonder who that man was?

 

Genetically determined sin is not part of this OP. Please start your own discussion.
It may not have been part of your OP but it was fair inference and a fair question by Innerfire89.

 

Also note you don't make the rules here.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not really and I knew you could not understand the point so I will spell it out again for you. Watch, it is not difficult.

 

You assumed there would be genealogies for those other sons and daughters. Yet you give no reason why there should have been. Again you cannot deuce that something does not exist simply because someone does not mention it. Moreover, there would have been no need for all the genealogies.

 

I, on the other hard, have given a very good reason why those genealogies are not in the text. They were not important to the author because he was concerned with the Messianic line. That is not difficult to figure out.

 

No doubt there are, but those are there for a reason. That is the point. No doubt there are many genealogies the author left out. Why? Because they were not important.

 

You can even write a proper English sentence or even spell the word genealogies correctly. You are not fit to even carry books much less read and understand them.

 

It is not my fault you cannot write a coherent sentence. The TR is a Geek text.

 

Good job! You missed the point again. You must work hard at being wrong so often. My point was, as if you could understand it now, the fact that something is not mention does mean it does not exist. How hard is that for you to understand?

 

lol What would you know about the word of God?

 

Yes, the TR is indeed a "Geek" text. It also contains other ancient languages.

 

I suggest you review the Posting Guidelines where personal accusations and criticisms are not allowed. Need I, or someone else, help you with them? Remember, according to Christ, you will be judged as you judge others. Right now, you have the occasion and the opportunity to straighten out your heart. There is no reward awaiting those who remain petty and stubborn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Adam did transgress by eating the fruit God commanded him not to and the earth was cursed because of it. (Gen. 3:17-19)

Where in Romans 5 is Eve mentioned?

 

Thank you for having the wisdom to ask for help from God. 1 Tim. 2:14 states, "Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression."

 

Are you able to say "Thank you?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Study more yourself. "Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned." I wonder who that man was?

 

It may not have been part of your OP but it was fair inference and a fair question by Innerfire89.

 

Also note you don't make the rules here.

 

It would follow logically that sin nature would be attributed to transhuman genetics if it where so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you able to say "Thank you?"

 

For what, avoiding the question? Have you Read Romans 5? Instead of jumping to another verse how about dealing with the verses in question?

 

God bless,

William

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thank you for having the wisdom to ask for help from God. 1 Tim. 2:14 states, "Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression."

 

Are you able to say "Thank you?"

 

Thank you for what? Being rude and demeaning throughout in all your comments? Gee thanks.

1 Tim. 2:14 isn't telling us Adam had no transgression, that verse tells us why there is roles for man and woman. Adam still ate the fruit it was just that Eve gave him the fruit.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, the TR is indeed a "Geek" text. It also contains other ancient languages.
Wrong again. The TR was a series of Greek texts. The first time the term was first used in the preface of the 1633 edition of the Greek New Testament published by the Elzevir brothers.

 

I suggest you review the Posting Guidelines where personal accusations and criticisms are not allowed.
What's the matter? You want to dish it out but you can't take it. Now you want to call foul?

 

Need I, or someone else, help you with them?
As I said before you can even write a proper English sentence or even spell the word genealogies correctly. You are not fit to even carry books much less read and understand them.

 

Remember, according to Christ, you will be judged as you judge others.
I know and believe me I am not worried.

 

Right now, you have the occasion and the opportunity to straighten out your heart.
I side with Christ who referred to those who distort the Word of God as hypocrites, vipers, blind guides, snakes.

 

There is no reward awaiting those who remain petty and stubborn.
Just as there is no reward for those like you who twist and distort the Word of God. Edited by Origen
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Study more yourself. "Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned." I wonder who that man was?

 

It may not have been part of your OP but it was fair inference and a fair question by Innerfire89.

 

Also note you don't make the rules here.

 

I did not infer I make any rules here.

 

Do you follow your own rules, or do you cut yourself slack? Do you allow yourself to make personal accusatory statements in violation of your own rules? Got a Godly answer to Magnify Christ?

 

I see you cannot state where I have twisted The Word of God.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thank you for what? Being rude and demeaning throughout in all your comments? Gee thanks.

1 Tim. 2:14 isn't telling us Adam had no transgression, that verse tells us why there is roles for man and woman. Adam still ate the fruit it was just that Eve gave him the fruit.

 

"Adam was not deceived, but the woman."

 

Pop Quiz: "Was Adam deceived?" Lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

"Adam was not deceived, but the woman."

 

Pop Quiz: "Was Adam deceived?" Lol.

 

Did he eat the fruit which God commanded him not to? Was eating the fruit an act of disobedience?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
Articles - News - Registration Terms