Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Welcome to Christforums the Protestant Community. You'll need to register in order to post your comments on your favorite topics and subjects. You'll also enjoy sharing media across multiple platforms. We hope you enjoy your fellowship here! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now


Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible- believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non- Nicene, non- Biblical heresy. God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now
Sign in to follow this  

What About John 3:16?

Recommended Posts

by Pastor John Samson


The question usually posed here is something like this: How can you reconcile belief in Divine election with John 3:16?


Most assume it is not possible. Actually, if we carefully take a look at the text and not just assume its meaning, John 3:16 is a wonderful scripture that in no way undermines the truth of Divine election.


It is certainly the most famous verse in the entire Bible. Here Jesus says: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.”


When hearing the biblical teaching on the subject of Divine election, some seek immediate refuge in a traditional, and may I say unbiblical, understanding of this verse.


They say this: “God can’t elect certain ones to salvation because John 3:16 says that God so loved the world that gave His Son so that WHOEVER believes in Christ would have eternal life. Therefore, God has done His part in offering the gift of salvation in His Son and just leaves it up to us to receive the gift through faith. Amen. Case closed!”


Though this is a very common tradition, and one I held to myself for many a year, it needs to be pointed out that in spite of the emphasis made by many people on the word “whoever,” the text does not actually discuss who does or does not have the ability to believe.


Someone might just as well be quoting John 3:16 to suggest that all churches need to have red carpets in their sanctuaries! Why? Because that also is not a topic addressed in the text. The verse is often quoted, but actually it has no relevance to the subject.


For the understanding of a text in the New Testament, we need to check the original language in which it was written, namely Koine Greek. It may come as a big surprise to learn that in the original Greek of John 3:16, there is no word corresponding to our English word “whoever.” The word “whoever” is expressing a phrase in Greek which is difficult to express smoothly in English.


Literally, the text reads “in order that every the one believing in Him, not to perish, but have everlasting life.”


It says “every” or “all the ones believing…” That’s hard to express in English. But in essence, it is saying “all the believing ones.” That’s what is being communicated. It is saying that there is no such thing as a believing one who does not receive eternal life, but who perishes. Though our English translation says “whoever believes,” the literal rendering is accurately translated as “every believing one” and the emphasis is NOT AT ALL on the “whosoever,” but on the belief. The ones BELIEVING will not have one consequence, but will have another. They will not perish but will have everlasting life.


Why? Because of the main verb – God GAVE His Son. God gave His Son for the purpose (Greek: hina) that every believing one should not perish, but that every believing one should have everlasting life.


John 3:16 actually speaks of a limitation -- of a particular, rather than a universal, redemption. For clearly, not everyone will be saved. Only those who believe in Christ are saved. The Father loved the world in this way: He gave His Son for the purpose of saving those who believe. The Son is given so that the believing ones will not perish, but by contrast, have eternal life. That is the purpose of the giving.


So, what John 3:16 teaches is:


ALL who do A (believe in Him)


will not B (perish)


but will have C (everlasting life)


What does this text tell us about who will believe or who can believe?


The answer is: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! The text does not address the issue of who will believe or who can believe.


However, if you do want to know John’s view on who can exercise faith, he does deal with that question – just not in this text. If you go back a few verses in the chapter to John 3:3, John quotes Jesus as saying “unless a man is born again he cannot enter the kingdom of God.” That’s clear, isn’t it?


Jesus said that a prerequisite, a necessary condition that must be met before someone can enter the kingdom of God, is that they are born again. We enter the kingdom of God through faith. But in order to enter the kingdom, we must first be born again, or made spiritually alive. If we are not FIRST born again, we cannot enter the kingdom of God.


This same issue is certainly addressed by Jesus, 3 chapters further on, in John 6:44, when He said, “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him. And I will raise him up on the last day.” It should be noted that the one drawn by the Father to the Son is also raised up on the last day to eternal life. (John 6:39, 40)


In John 6:65, Jesus said, “This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by the Father.”


Of course, all who exercise true faith will certainly be saved. John 3:16 clearly teaches that. Anyone believing in Christ will not perish but have everlasting life.


But what we need to ask is, “Who will have faith?”


The Reformed, and biblical, view is that only the elect will be brought to faith. No one can come to Christ unless God does something to enable that person to come.


So why do people miss what John 3:16 teaches or read into it (eisegesis) what is not actually in the text?


That’s easy. It is because of how they have heard John 3:16 used over and over and over again. They have an ingrained, preconceived notion of what the verse says, and fail to question that assumption and read the text for what it actually says.


It’s a tradition. And if you dare question it, you might be accused of questioning the very word of God, rather than their traditional interpretation of the word of God. And that can create a whole lot of emotion.This text, of course, is just one example of many that could be quoted, but it does show us how powerful our traditions can be. We need to continuously expose our traditions to the light of God’s Word. If they can be confirmed by detailed study of the text of Scripture, we can be sure that the traditions are valid. If not, then we need to dispense with them. Let God be true and every man a liar… even if the “man” here refers to our own firmly held beliefs, but not the testimony of Scripture itself.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

WHOEVER is just that, whoever. That in itself precludes election. As John Samson is not here to defend this eisegesis, I won't bother going any further.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.