Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Welcome to Christforums the Protestant Community. You'll need to register in order to post your comments on your favorite topics and subjects. You'll also enjoy sharing media across multiple platforms. We hope you enjoy your fellowship here! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Christforums

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible- believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non- Nicene, non- Biblical heresy. God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now
Sign in to follow this  
Christforums

Atheist Group Backs Couple Who Were Forced to Marry by Texas Judge

Recommended Posts

A Texas judge who ruled that a young man had to get married, write down Bible verses, and receive counseling for punishment of a misdemeanor is now facing prosecution himself.

 

 

 

 

More...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The atheist group Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) issued a formal complaint to Judge Randall Rogers, stating that Rogers had overstepped his constitutional duties by issuing a sentence that imposed his own religious beliefs on the defendant.

 

Oh, so now marriage is religious? We have to support SSM, or face fines and jail, because marriage isn't religious, But, if we support marriage for any good reason then marriage is religious. Did the judge say a civil marriage wouldn't count?

 

Is the couple that the judge wants to marry complaining, or just the FFRF?

 

Are judges not allowed to consider a whole range of factors in handing down sentences? It seems to me that the FFRF is demanding religious discrimination, that judges should be barred from using religious factors as mitigating circumstances. That is, it would be okay to spare the young man from jail time if he agreed to pick up up trash along the highway or any other "positive" commitments, just as long as it's not state-sanctioned marriage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I applaud the Judge and his decision. Obviously the defendant refused his sentence for an ultimatum. The Judge observed moral sin in the life of the defendant. The defendant refuses to address either, protecting his girlfriend's virtue he says, by hitting another man that insulted his girlfriend. Obviously that defense was a sham and the moral corrupt defendant belongs behind bars, he has no desire to truly understand nor defend the virtue of another.

 

God bless,

William

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I, also, applaud the judge.

 

The judge didn't order the young man to get married, contrary to how the media portrays it. The judge sentenced him to 15 days in jail for assault, a very standard punishment. The judge offered that if the man marries his woman whose virtue he claimed to have been defending, then he'd get out of the standard punishment. The offer of marriage is inherently non-religious (by the standards of our legal system). It's the couple's own concern they want to make it religious. It's typical of judges to suspend sentences based on mitigating factors unrelated to the crime itself, such as for future commitments, like joining the military or joining Alcoholics Anonymous.

 

If the man didn't approve, he could have taken the standard punishment.

 

I don't see how this complaint against the judge can go anywhere, except Liberals in high places are malevolent and lawless, always seeking excuses to do evil.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×