Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Are you Protestant? Or, are you sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community. You'll need to register in order to post your comments on your favorite topics and subjects. Register in less than a minute, it is simple, fast, and free! We hope you enjoy your fellowship here! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Christforums

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible- believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non- Nicene, non- Biblical heresy.
Register now

Christforums is:

.... an orthodox Protestant forum whose members espouse the Apostolic doctrines in the Biblical theologies set forth by Augustine, Martin Luther, Ulrich Zwingli, John Calvin and John Knox etc. We do not "argue" with nor do we solicit the membership of people who espouse secular or cultic ideologies. We believe that our conversations are to be faith building and posts that advance heretical or apostate thinking will be immediately deleted and the poster permanently banned from the forum. This is a Christian community for people to explore the traditional theologies of Classical Protestantism. Those who would challenge the peace and harmony that we enjoy here as fellow believers are directed to another forum.

Enjoy your fellowship

In order to understand the importance of Christian fellowship, we must first understand what Christian fellowship is and what it isn’t. The Greek words translated “fellowship” in the New Testament mean essentially a partnership to the mutual benefit of those involved. Christian fellowship, then, is the mutually beneficial relationship between Christians, who can’t have the identical relationship with those outside the faith. Those who believe the gospel are united in the Spirit through Christ to the Father, and that unity is the basis of fellowship. This relationship is described by Jesus in His high-priestly prayer for His followers in John 17:23. The importance of true Christian fellowship is that it reinforces Christ centeredness in our mind and helps us to focus on Christ and His desires and goals for us. As iron sharpens iron, in true Christian fellowship Christians sharpen one another's faith and stir one another to exercise that faith in love and good works, all to God’s glory.
Pouty Puppy

40 Questions Special Counsel Robert Mueller Needs to Answer Now

Recommended Posts

I wonder if Mueller can be investigated? Pulled from this counsel,  the investigation closed, and Mueller and his team then become the one's being investigated. Because these are some really fine points. And especially in question is Andrew Weissman. How did Mueller think he would add Andrew to his team with that sordid past following him? And media at the very least wouldn't notice? Weissman alone takes away from any full faith and trust the public may be compelled to have for this special counsel. Maybe that as the point. 
This witch hunt actually has someone at the head of it that wants the public to be aware that's just what it is. Mueller has a corrupt past, and one of those he asks to assist him does too. It's a partisan circus with clowns entering stage left. Their goal? I think it is to make us look weak to our enemies abroad. 

 

The full list is linked here:https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/40-questions-that-special-counsel-robert-mueller-needs-to-answer-now/

 

40 Questions Special Counsel Robert Mueller Needs to Answer Now

A Republican lawmaker contends the prosecutor has a lot to explain about his present job and prior posts as well

by Rep. Louie Gohmert | Updated 04 May 2018

 

A firestorm was ignited earlier this week when The New York Times published a list of 40 questions that special counsel Robert Mueller allegedly wants President Donald J. Trump to answer under oath.

It is a revealing list of questions, proving that after a year of strong-arming Trump family and friends, bankrupting Trump campaign volunteers and former staff, and leaking like a sieve, Mueller has found no evidence of any crime by the president whatsoever.

But since Mueller has wasted millions of tax dollars and endless hours of Trump’s time, it’s time for the special counsel to answer some questions. Let’s start with a few on the present runaway railroading of the president, then a look back to prior instances of the same sordid behavior by Mueller.

 

Regarding Your Trump “Investigation”
1.) Why did you hire only lawyers with backgrounds asDemocratic Party donors for your investigative team? Were there no Establishment Republicans willing to help railroad President Trump?

2.) Peter Strzok was removed from your team after more than 10,000 texts between him and fellow team member Lisa Page were found to contain vitriolic anti-Trump tirades. These texts were not simply anti-Trump. They were more in the nature of desperate attempts to stop him from becoming president and talk of a nefarious insurance policy to orchestrate his removal if he were elected. Did they ever speak this way about Donald Trump in your presence? Why were you so determined to have people with outright hatred of Donald Trump on your special counsel team?

 

3.) Andrew Weissman has unsightly political ties, having attended Clinton’s election-night celebration in New York City.He also sent an email to acting Attorney General Sally Yates, praising her boldness on the night she was fired for refusing to enforce President Trump’s travel ban. Not to mention his vast history of prosecutorial abuses.

Both of you were involved in the investigation into Russia’s illegal efforts to obtain U.S. uranium. Did either of you alert the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to the crimes being committed? The plea deals? Did either of you profit in any way from the $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation or from those who benefited from the sale of U.S. uranium that would ultimately end up in the hands of Russian owners? Do you consider this to be a potential conflict of interest to the current investigation?

Much more::https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/40-questions-that-special-counsel-robert-mueller-needs-to-answer-now/

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Pouty Puppy said:

I wonder if Mueller can be investigated? Pulled from this counsel,  the investigation closed, and Mueller and his team then become the one's being investigated. Because these are some really fine points. And especially in question is Andrew Weissman. How did Mueller think he would add Andrew to his team with that sordid past following him? And media at the very least wouldn't notice? Weissman alone takes away from any full faith and trust the public may be compelled to have for this special counsel. Maybe that as the point. 
This witch hunt actually has someone at the head of it that wants the public to be aware that's just what it is. Mueller has a corrupt past, and one of those he asks to assist him does too. It's a partisan circus with clowns entering stage left. Their goal? I think it is to make us look weak to our enemies abroad. 

 

The full list is linked here:https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/40-questions-that-special-counsel-robert-mueller-needs-to-answer-now/

 

40 Questions Special Counsel Robert Mueller Needs to Answer Now

A Republican lawmaker contends the prosecutor has a lot to explain about his present job and prior posts as well

by Rep. Louie Gohmert | Updated 04 May 2018

 

A firestorm was ignited earlier this week when The New York Times published a list of 40 questions that special counsel Robert Mueller allegedly wants President Donald J. Trump to answer under oath.

It is a revealing list of questions, proving that after a year of strong-arming Trump family and friends, bankrupting Trump campaign volunteers and former staff, and leaking like a sieve, Mueller has found no evidence of any crime by the president whatsoever.

But since Mueller has wasted millions of tax dollars and endless hours of Trump’s time, it’s time for the special counsel to answer some questions. Let’s start with a few on the present runaway railroading of the president, then a look back to prior instances of the same sordid behavior by Mueller.

 

Regarding Your Trump “Investigation”
1.) Why did you hire only lawyers with backgrounds asDemocratic Party donors for your investigative team? Were there no Establishment Republicans willing to help railroad President Trump?

2.) Peter Strzok was removed from your team after more than 10,000 texts between him and fellow team member Lisa Page were found to contain vitriolic anti-Trump tirades. These texts were not simply anti-Trump. They were more in the nature of desperate attempts to stop him from becoming president and talk of a nefarious insurance policy to orchestrate his removal if he were elected. Did they ever speak this way about Donald Trump in your presence? Why were you so determined to have people with outright hatred of Donald Trump on your special counsel team?

 

3.) Andrew Weissman has unsightly political ties, having attended Clinton’s election-night celebration in New York City.He also sent an email to acting Attorney General Sally Yates, praising her boldness on the night she was fired for refusing to enforce President Trump’s travel ban. Not to mention his vast history of prosecutorial abuses.

Both of you were involved in the investigation into Russia’s illegal efforts to obtain U.S. uranium. Did either of you alert the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to the crimes being committed? The plea deals? Did either of you profit in any way from the $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation or from those who benefited from the sale of U.S. uranium that would ultimately end up in the hands of Russian owners? Do you consider this to be a potential conflict of interest to the current investigation?

Much more::https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/40-questions-that-special-counsel-robert-mueller-needs-to-answer-now/

the inspector general (michael horowitz) is investigating the mueller team pre-mueller -

 

in the course of the investigation the IG probably by default will end up with info on mueller too -

 

i'm not sure if weisman was involved at all with the fisa nonsense against PT - if so he might also be investigated

 

praying the IG investigation will go to the farthest ends of the spectrum in the same way the mueller investigation has - simply for the fact that the mueller investigation has been unfairly going to the farthest reaches and beyond

 

1. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/04/doj-inspector-generals-testimony-postponed-amid-new-leads-in-clinton-case-review.amp.html

2. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/02/were-strzok-page-texts-deleted-sources-say-ig-flagged-gaps-in-record.amp.html

3. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/03/comey-s-memo-leak-contact-worked-at-fbi-for-over-year-defended-him-in-media-on-clinton-probe.amp.html

4. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/05/ig-report-on-clinton-email-case-document-dump-could-hold-new-year-bombshells.html

5. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/12/05/gregg-jarrett-how-fbi-official-with-political-agenda-corrupted-both-mueller-and-comey-investigations.html

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/7/2018 at 4:57 PM, Pouty Puppy said:

I wonder if Mueller can be investigated? Pulled from this counsel,  the investigation closed, and Mueller and his team then become the one's being investigated. Because these are some really fine points. And especially in question is Andrew Weissman. How did Mueller think he would add Andrew to his team with that sordid past following him? And media at the very least wouldn't notice? Weissman alone takes away from any full faith and trust the public may be compelled to have for this special counsel. Maybe that as the point. 
This witch hunt actually has someone at the head of it that wants the public to be aware that's just what it is. Mueller has a corrupt past, and one of those he asks to assist him does too. It's a partisan circus with clowns entering stage left. Their goal? I think it is to make us look weak to our enemies abroad. 

 

The full list is linked here:https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/40-questions-that-special-counsel-robert-mueller-needs-to-answer-now/

 

40 Questions Special Counsel Robert Mueller Needs to Answer Now

A Republican lawmaker contends the prosecutor has a lot to explain about his present job and prior posts as well

by Rep. Louie Gohmert | Updated 04 May 2018

 

A firestorm was ignited earlier this week when The New York Times published a list of 40 questions that special counsel Robert Mueller allegedly wants President Donald J. Trump to answer under oath.

It is a revealing list of questions, proving that after a year of strong-arming Trump family and friends, bankrupting Trump campaign volunteers and former staff, and leaking like a sieve, Mueller has found no evidence of any crime by the president whatsoever.

But since Mueller has wasted millions of tax dollars and endless hours of Trump’s time, it’s time for the special counsel to answer some questions. Let’s start with a few on the present runaway railroading of the president, then a look back to prior instances of the same sordid behavior by Mueller.

 

Regarding Your Trump “Investigation”
1.) Why did you hire only lawyers with backgrounds asDemocratic Party donors for your investigative team? Were there no Establishment Republicans willing to help railroad President Trump?

2.) Peter Strzok was removed from your team after more than 10,000 texts between him and fellow team member Lisa Page were found to contain vitriolic anti-Trump tirades. These texts were not simply anti-Trump. They were more in the nature of desperate attempts to stop him from becoming president and talk of a nefarious insurance policy to orchestrate his removal if he were elected. Did they ever speak this way about Donald Trump in your presence? Why were you so determined to have people with outright hatred of Donald Trump on your special counsel team?

 

3.) Andrew Weissman has unsightly political ties, having attended Clinton’s election-night celebration in New York City.He also sent an email to acting Attorney General Sally Yates, praising her boldness on the night she was fired for refusing to enforce President Trump’s travel ban. Not to mention his vast history of prosecutorial abuses.

Both of you were involved in the investigation into Russia’s illegal efforts to obtain U.S. uranium. Did either of you alert the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to the crimes being committed? The plea deals? Did either of you profit in any way from the $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation or from those who benefited from the sale of U.S. uranium that would ultimately end up in the hands of Russian owners? Do you consider this to be a potential conflict of interest to the current investigation?

Much more::https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/40-questions-that-special-counsel-robert-mueller-needs-to-answer-now/

 

19 hours ago, Truthfrees said:

the inspector general (michael horowitz) is investigating the mueller team pre-mueller -

 

in the course of the investigation the IG probably by default will end up with info on mueller too -

 

i'm not sure if weisman was involved at all with the fisa nonsense against PT - if so he might also be investigated

 

praying the IG investigation will go to the farthest ends of the spectrum in the same way the mueller investigation has - simply for the fact that the mueller investigation has been unfairly going to the farthest reaches and beyond

 

1. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/04/doj-inspector-generals-testimony-postponed-amid-new-leads-in-clinton-case-review.amp.html

2. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/02/were-strzok-page-texts-deleted-sources-say-ig-flagged-gaps-in-record.amp.html

3. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/03/comey-s-memo-leak-contact-worked-at-fbi-for-over-year-defended-him-in-media-on-clinton-probe.amp.html

4. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/05/ig-report-on-clinton-email-case-document-dump-could-hold-new-year-bombshells.html

5. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/12/05/gregg-jarrett-how-fbi-official-with-political-agenda-corrupted-both-mueller-and-comey-investigations.html

just found out andrew weisman is the prosecutor judge ellis chewed out at manafort's trial - so andrew weisman and mueller are deep into corrupt prosecution practices

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Truthfrees said:

 

just found out andrew weisman is the prosecutor judge ellis chewed out at manafort's trial - so andrew weisman and mueller are deep into corrupt prosecution practices

And yet being this is all going public now and was out there when Weisman was found to be corrupt all that time ago well before this, there are still those who hate Trump enough that they'll back these Weisman and Mueller no matter what. Because hate for Trump surpasses all. 

We have to realize, though we plebes will never know the depths the wicked plunged to backing Hillary, that when she lost a lot of people that turned their morals into pretzels to get her payback as prospective, sure to win, HRC first woman President of the U.S.. 
Now that she's not able to grant those promises from that chair everybody is after the one that beat her and them . 

 

Who would trust that woman at the highest office of power when she happily without a second thought betrayed all Americans, the U.S.. and our national security, for money! And she did much of it under orders from her boss, Barack H. Obama. 

 

People just don't think. The partisan loyalists love the Left side of politics more than they love this country. 

Hillary was like a play dough doll. She'd bend and shape anyway money coercion asked her to. Russia collusion concerning Trump was bogus from the start. But we know Hillary sold Uranium to Russia! THAT is Russia collusion. And treason! 

The Clinton Foundation. What a perfect name for the home base of a money laundering scheme .

 

NY Times article (NYT is known to be a liberal paper)

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Pouty Puppy said:

And yet being this is all going public now and was out there when Weisman was found to be corrupt all that time ago well before this, there are still those who hate Trump enough that they'll back these Weisman and Mueller no matter what. Because hate for Trump surpasses all. 

We have to realize, though we plebes will never know the depths the wicked plunged to backing Hillary, that when she lost a lot of people that turned their morals into pretzels to get her payback as prospective, sure to win, HRC first woman President of the U.S.. 
Now that she's not able to grant those promises from that chair everybody is after the one that beat her and them . 

 

Who would trust that woman at the highest office of power when she happily without a second thought betrayed all Americans, the U.S.. and our national security, for money! And she did much of it under orders from her boss, Barack H. Obama. 

 

People just don't think. The partisan loyalists love the Left side of politics more than they love this country. 

Hillary was like a play dough doll. She'd bend and shape anyway money coercion asked her to. Russia collusion concerning Trump was bogus from the start. But we know Hillary sold Uranium to Russia! THAT is Russia collusion. And treason! 

The Clinton Foundation. What a perfect name for the home base of a money laundering scheme .

 

NY Times article (NYT is known to be a liberal paper)

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

this is very true - imo though many liberal plebes know even less than republican plebes - because they believe the media lies

 

i think PT was elected because many liberals knew the truth when they heard it from PT and switched away from hillary and over to PT

 

even cbs polled and admitted that with all the fake news out there PT's approval rating is 53% and climbing

 

the truth is just beginning to roll and i don't think fake news will be able to stop it now

 

imo this time things will get taken care of properly and the future of politics will eventually change

 

the swamp is being drained and at the end of PT's 8 year term he should be able to finish the job - and the r's will find a whole new support base

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The swamp creatures are scared to death. They can't bribe this President , they can't threaten him, and he doesn't hate America so as to make their jobs easier in destroying it from the inside. Because he'll fight them tooth and nail. It's refreshing to have a President in office that is both a professing Christian, who invokes God, the Bible, and Jesus publicly , and who loves this country . 

God bless and protect him from all enemies foreign and domestic. 

 

Robert Mueller's days are numbered I'd say. He's not fit to investigate anyone when we learn how worthy of investigation he is. As well as those he chooses to assist. 

It's like asking the Mafia to investigate a church to see if there is any corruption and report back. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×