Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Welcome to Christforums the Protestant Community. You'll need to register in order to post your comments on your favorite topics and subjects. You'll also enjoy sharing media across multiple platforms. We hope you enjoy your fellowship here! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Christforums

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible- believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non- Nicene, non- Biblical heresy. God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now
Sign in to follow this  
lindbergh

Did humans really live for hundreds of years before?

Recommended Posts

This has long been one of my questions since I was a kid and nobody could give me a concrete and convincing answer. The bible tells a lot of stories with a lot of characters in them. It also accounts for how many sons and daughters each character had and how long they lived. In the old testament, there are a lot of characters who the bible claimed have lived for hundreds of years. Is this really true?

 

Did people in the past really live for hundreds of years? What was the secret of the people in the past? Did they have a healthier diet?

Did they have access to the elixir of life?

Was it because the ozone layer wasn't as messed up as it is now?

 

Or did they just not have a true measure of time before and the years that they have been talking about is not composed of 365 days?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly don't know whether those ages written in the Bible are accurate or more of an exaggeration. For someone to have lived 150+ years with the sanitation, the medicine, and the lifestyle of ancient times, I honestly don't think it's very realistic (unless with God's direct intervention, of course).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adam was as a close to perfect as can be. Being the first man, he would have passed on his incredible health to his children, having no genetic defaults.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the human body is designed to age and break down within a rough time frame of 120 years. Whilst it may be possible for humans to live much longer than we do currently it's clear that some of the 200+ year ages given for certain biblical figures are exaggerations and/or metaphorical.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It can be a literal exaggeration for sure. To feel that a character in the Bible was really wise and old and smart you usually read that they are more than hundred years old.

Don't forget about that Bible stories are mostly metaphors and guidelines for your life. Nothing is literal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adam and Eve would have lived forever if they hadn't sinned. Compared with this a lifespan of several hundred years is very short. Over time the effects of sin led to additional defects in humans which shortened the life span to what it is today.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back at the time when Adam lived, there were hardly any diseases, there was absolutely no pollution and before the flood so it's possible that living in such a place that was almost perfect, people could live for hundreds of years. In any case I don't doubt the veracity of the bible. Scripture says they lived hundreds of years and I believe it.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the Bible, people lived for centuries. But we haven't found a skeleton that support anyone living as long as the current generation due to our great medical knowledge and technology. The average life span was somewhere between twenty and thirty-six, sorry I can't remember exact numbers, if they lived that long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
According to the Bible, people lived for centuries. But we haven't found a skeleton that support anyone living as long as the current generation due to our great medical knowledge and technology. The average life span was somewhere between twenty and thirty-six, sorry I can't remember exact numbers, if they lived that long.

 

Just curious, where have you looked for the remains of those pre-flood people that were listed in Scripture?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Just curious, where have you looked for those pre-flood people that were listed in Scripture, those that lived for centuries?

 

What do you mean, looked for? In the Bible, the first couple of books from the Old Testament. But if you mean for the skeletons, there are museums full of skeletons and mummies of people who never saw past their 40th birth day. Some will, but it was rare due to plagues, diseases, and lack of plumbing to get rid of fecal matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What do you mean, looked for? In the Bible, the first couple of books from the Old Testament. But if you mean for the skeletons, there are museums full of skeletons and mummies of people who never saw past their 40th birth day. Some will, but it was rare due to plagues, diseases, and lack of plumbing to get rid of fecal matter.

 

You said you haven't found any skeletal remains of those pre-flood persons named in Scripture. So I ask, where have you looked? If you haven't maybe that's part of the problem? If not, who else is looking?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the ages listed in the Bible that people in ancient times live for up to 800 years. My scientific explanation is the genes as @William had said, is free from defects, and the clean atmosphere since there is no pollution yet and no virus or harmful microbes. And the food that they eat are probably clean since they are purely organic. Isn't it a wonder why the herbal supplements are getting popular? Maybe those herbs were part of the staple in the ancient times, another reason for the longevity. And another reason that I can think of is the way of life that we have now against the lifestyle of the long ago. Perhaps they also have less stress and pressure. So it boils down to simple living.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You said you haven't found any skeletal remains of those pre-flood persons named in Scripture. So I ask, where have you looked? If you haven't maybe that's part of the problem? If not, who else is looking?

 

Archeologist are looking constantly around the world for everything from flora to fauna. If they haven't found it or proof of it, then it probably doesn't exist. I look at the ages at the beginning of the book the way I consider the size of a fish in my Grandpa's stories, it keeps getting bigger every time you hear it. Did you know that Torah, or what is now know as the Torah, was originally a bunch of stories hat were passed down from generation to generation until they were forced to live in Babylon. Because of how appealing the Jews viewed Babylonian culture, they wrote down the first Torah which is the beginning of what we now call a Bible. Which the creation of the Bible is kind of iffy, since half of it is missing.

 

Isn't it arrogant to ask me where I've looked for skeletons? There are evidence of prehistory creatures from millions of years ago but we haven't found a multi-century old human skeleton that wasn't a fake. I will believe that the beginning of the Bible was literal when there is physical proof of ancient humans. Heck, Abraham was after the flood and he supposedly died at a ripe old age of hundred and seventy-five (Genesis 25:8). And he might have, but that would be rare and I don't believe it without physical proof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd just like to point out that those people that lived for hundreds of years were the patriarchs. And their names are limited to only a handful of individuals. I think it is arrogant to even suggest that you or "they" have a chance of actually digging up a PRE-FLOOD patriarch. You seem to put much credibility in those stocking museums. By the way, have you seen the museum exhibitions of an ape to man? Just curious, do you believe they are real?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the Bible, Adam and Eve were designed to live forever and never grow old. But, when they fell, they brought death to us all, and that death had to occur before we surpassed the age of a thousand years. This is because to God, a thousand years is as one day and He told them they would die within the day. We don't know precisely how long the two lived in Eden before the fall, which could explain their longevity. Also, the atmosphere was different then, in the pre-flood days, so everything lived longer, grew bigger and was healthier. The oldest man who ever lived, Methuselah, still died before he reached a thousand years. He was 969 years old, I believe. His family tree shows a gradual decline in longevity from that point on, and eventually God declared 120 years to be the perfect lifetime for the average human. His reasons for the decline in age? Not sure, but probably has something to do with the increase in population. If every human being lived 900 years or so, the world would be grossly over-populated.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

A place was discovered where there were 15 skeletons found all buried together. They were called the Naledi, they had a smaller brain and teeth like the modern human, and a skull similar to a modern human except it had a larger brow bone.

Apparently they would have lived about three million years ago in Africa. They were found in a cave, all together which shows they at least lived together in a kind of community and studies showed that they were capable of ritual behaviour.

There have been others found too, makes me wonder, who was their God?

 

Here is an interesting link to an article about a teenage girl’s bones found who apparently lived 12 to 13000 years ago.

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-16/13000-year-old-skeleton-found-in-mexican-cave/5456472

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There have been others found too, makes me wonder, who was their God?

There is only one God, the one revealed in the Bible. All humans that have ever existed are descendants of Adam and Eve. The belief that they lived three million years ago is simply a human opinion by scientist who reject the truth of the Bible. Here is an explanation of why so many researchers make this kind of mistake.

 

https://clydeherrin.wordpress.com/2016/02/11/flood-deniers-2/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

A place was discovered where there were 15 skeletons found all buried together. They were called the Naledi, they had a smaller brain and teeth like the modern human, and a skull similar to a modern human except it had a larger brow bone.

Apparently they would have lived about three million years ago in Africa. They were found in a cave, all together which shows they at least lived together in a kind of community and studies showed that they were capable of ritual behaviour.

There have been others found too, makes me wonder, who was their God?

Here is an interesting link to an article about a teenage girl’s bones found who apparently lived 12 to 13000 years ago.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-1...n-cave/5456472

I am a believer in Biblical creation, and in the young earth theory, but even those who believe that the earth is millions of years old do not think that there were villages of humans three million years ago. The link you posted was to a different find of early civilization, not something that was three million years ago.

However, I am having trouble relating your post to the topic of this thread, which is how long did early Biblical men actually live to be in years, not how long ago humanity actually started.

I think that , as William mentioned, Adam was created perfect, the world was perfect and undefiled back then, there was more oxygen in the air, and all the food they ate was pure and healthy.

Barring accidental deaths, or wars, it seems possible to me that these early patriarchs could have lived a much longer lifespan than we are able to live now, even with our medical advances.

Since God designed our bodies to last indefinitely, and that time was shortened when mankind disobeyed God, it seems reasonable to think that those early people were able to live longer than we can now with our polluted earth and unhealthy eating habits.

 

Edited by Happyflowerlady
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The bible does give accounts, specifically in Genesis, that humans were living an average of 500 years or more. The oldest recorded individual lived well into his 900s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When man was created he was to take dominion over the Earth. We should remember man was to dominate the Earth, it's sin that brings sorrow and death. If the Bible says men lived hundreds of years then I believe totally. This days we see cases of people who still live beyond 100 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe people lived 100 years, however, I don't think living 100 years was common in the early times.These days we can see people living 100 years, but do all people live 100 yes? Living 100 years is just an exception. The average life expectancy in my country is 60 years. In fact people died young from diseases and war

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some say that the earth has been around in existence for nearly 6,000 years, or six full sabbaths in this sense. On the seventh sabbath, God will rest and we will have a millenial kingdom of peace and true, abundant safety on the earth. Satan will not interfere then, but that is yet to come.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I believe people lived 100 years, however, I don't think living 100 years was common in the early times.These days we can see people living 100 years, but do all people live 100 yes? Living 100 years is just an exception. The average life expectancy in my country is 60 years. In fact people died young from diseases and war

 

Well I can't tell if living up to 100 years was common in the early days. The only thing I can argue is that Bible has given us accounts of men who lived hundreds of years while on Earth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Living 100 years is just an exception.

It was an exception before the flood too, but in a different way. Today a person rarely lives to be that old. Before the flood is someone only lived 100 years it would have been considered a tragedy that he died so young.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adam and Eve were as mortal as you and I, but once they had taken of the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, they suffered spiritual death and eternal separation from God.

 

Why the long lives?

 

A) Access to the Tree of Life extended their lives.

 

B) The great ages has allegorical significance, perhaps an expression of their greatness.

 

 

Just as Noah`s Flood occurred in a contemporary time shared with many great civilizations including the Egyptians who don't have a flood legend. It was a local flood... a massive flood.

 

But the Hebrew word eretz means "world" or "earth" also means land, nation, country, etc.

​​

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×